Austria vs Japan: Vulnerability score, Heath
Vulnerability score, Heath over time
- Austria
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0.1971 against 0.1939 in Austria, a difference of 0.0032.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 184th and Japan ranks 183rd of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.2126 | 0.2027 | 0.0099 | Austria |
| 2020s | 0.1944 | 0.1972 | 0.0028 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerability score, heath, Austria or Japan?
- Japan, at 0.1971 against 0.1939 in Austria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in vulnerability score, heath between Austria and Japan?
- 0.0032, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Japan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Japan rank globally for vulnerability score, heath?
- Austria ranks 184th and Japan ranks 183rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability score, Heath. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ND-GAIN index is a global free open-source index, that measures a country’s current vulnerability to climate disruptions and assesses a country’s readiness to leverage private and public sector investment for adaptive actions. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN index is an adaptation of the original index, adjusted by IMF staff to replace the Doing Business (DB) Index, used as source data in the original ND-GAIN, because the DB database has been discontinued by the World Bank in 2020 and it is no longer allowed in IMF work. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN is an interim solution offered by IMF staff until the ND-GAIN compilers will review the methodology and replace the DB index.