Australia vs Japan: Vulnerability score, Heath
Vulnerability score, Heath over time
- Australia
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0.1971 against 0.1886 in Australia, a difference of 0.0085.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 186th and Japan ranks 183rd of 190 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1964 | 0.2027 | 0.0063 | Japan |
| 2020s | 0.1892 | 0.1972 | 0.0079 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerability score, heath, Australia or Japan?
- Japan, at 0.1971 against 0.1886 in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in vulnerability score, heath between Australia and Japan?
- 0.0085, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Japan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Japan rank globally for vulnerability score, heath?
- Australia ranks 186th and Japan ranks 183rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability score, Heath. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ND-GAIN index is a global free open-source index, that measures a country’s current vulnerability to climate disruptions and assesses a country’s readiness to leverage private and public sector investment for adaptive actions. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN index is an adaptation of the original index, adjusted by IMF staff to replace the Doing Business (DB) Index, used as source data in the original ND-GAIN, because the DB database has been discontinued by the World Bank in 2020 and it is no longer allowed in IMF work. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN is an interim solution offered by IMF staff until the ND-GAIN compilers will review the methodology and replace the DB index.