Malta vs Romania: Vulnerability score, Habitat
Vulnerability score, Habitat over time
- Malta
- Romania
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0.4756 against 0.4756 in Romania, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 116th and Romania ranks 117th of 192 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5043 | 0.467 | 0.0373 | Malta |
| 2020s | 0.4785 | 0.4745 | 0.004 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerability score, habitat, Malta or Romania?
- Malta, at 0.4756 against 0.4756 in Romania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in vulnerability score, habitat between Malta and Romania?
- 0, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Romania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Malta and Romania rank globally for vulnerability score, habitat?
- Malta ranks 116th and Romania ranks 117th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability score, Habitat. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ND-GAIN index is a global free open-source index, that measures a country’s current vulnerability to climate disruptions and assesses a country’s readiness to leverage private and public sector investment for adaptive actions. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN index is an adaptation of the original index, adjusted by IMF staff to replace the Doing Business (DB) Index, used as source data in the original ND-GAIN, because the DB database has been discontinued by the World Bank in 2020 and it is no longer allowed in IMF work. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN is an interim solution offered by IMF staff until the ND-GAIN compilers will review the methodology and replace the DB index.