Cuba vs Palau: Vulnerability score, Habitat
Vulnerability score, Habitat over time
- Cuba
- Palau
How they compare
Palau currently reports 0.5635 against 0.5589 in Cuba, a difference of 0.0046.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 55th and Palau ranks 52nd of 192 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Palau in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.558 | 0.5475 | 0.0105 | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0.5592 | 0.5604 | 0.0012 | Palau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerability score, habitat, Cuba or Palau?
- Palau, at 0.5635 against 0.5589 in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in vulnerability score, habitat between Cuba and Palau?
- 0.0046, with Palau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Palau?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Palau rank globally for vulnerability score, habitat?
- Cuba ranks 55th and Palau ranks 52nd of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability score, Habitat. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ND-GAIN index is a global free open-source index, that measures a country’s current vulnerability to climate disruptions and assesses a country’s readiness to leverage private and public sector investment for adaptive actions. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN index is an adaptation of the original index, adjusted by IMF staff to replace the Doing Business (DB) Index, used as source data in the original ND-GAIN, because the DB database has been discontinued by the World Bank in 2020 and it is no longer allowed in IMF work. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN is an interim solution offered by IMF staff until the ND-GAIN compilers will review the methodology and replace the DB index.