Estonia vs Japan: Vulnerability score, Food
Vulnerability score, Food over time
- Estonia
- Japan
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0.2532 against 0.2452 in Japan, a difference of 0.008.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 169th and Japan ranks 172nd of 189 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.2498 | 0.2459 | 0.0039 | Estonia |
| 2020s | 0.2493 | 0.2455 | 0.0038 | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerability score, food, Estonia or Japan?
- Estonia, at 0.2532 against 0.2452 in Japan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in vulnerability score, food between Estonia and Japan?
- 0.008, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Japan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Estonia and Japan rank globally for vulnerability score, food?
- Estonia ranks 169th and Japan ranks 172nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Vulnerability score, Food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ND-GAIN index is a global free open-source index, that measures a country’s current vulnerability to climate disruptions and assesses a country’s readiness to leverage private and public sector investment for adaptive actions. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN index is an adaptation of the original index, adjusted by IMF staff to replace the Doing Business (DB) Index, used as source data in the original ND-GAIN, because the DB database has been discontinued by the World Bank in 2020 and it is no longer allowed in IMF work. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN is an interim solution offered by IMF staff until the ND-GAIN compilers will review the methodology and replace the DB index.