South Africa vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Vegetable consumption per capita

South Africa
37.31 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
36.03 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
South Africa rank
162nd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
164th

Vegetable consumption per capita over time

  • South Africa
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
204060196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 37.31 kilograms per year per capita against 36.03 kilograms per year per capita in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 1.28 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 162nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 164th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 4 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 47.68 kilograms per year per capita 11.94 kilograms per year per capita 35.74 kilograms per year per capita South Africa
1970s 47.76 kilograms per year per capita 14.66 kilograms per year per capita 33.1 kilograms per year per capita South Africa
1980s 46.93 kilograms per year per capita 24.6 kilograms per year per capita 22.34 kilograms per year per capita South Africa
1990s 41.32 kilograms per year per capita 39.01 kilograms per year per capita 2.31 kilograms per year per capita South Africa
2000s 40.9 kilograms per year per capita 54.53 kilograms per year per capita 13.64 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 41.75 kilograms per year per capita 42.02 kilograms per year per capita 0.2775 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 37.6 kilograms per year per capita 45.18 kilograms per year per capita 7.57 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetable consumption per capita, South Africa or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
South Africa, at 37.31 kilograms per year per capita against 36.03 kilograms per year per capita in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetable consumption per capita between South Africa and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
1.28 kilograms per year per capita, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for vegetable consumption per capita?
South Africa ranks 162nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 164th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Vegetable consumption per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Vegetable consumption per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/vegetable-consumption-per-capita/south-africa/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/vegetable-consumption-per-capita/south-africa/st-kitts-and-nevis/">South Africa vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Vegetable consumption per capita</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetable consumption per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.