Libya vs Maldives: Vegetable consumption per capita
Libya
193.31 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Maldives
195.95 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Libya rank
22nd
Maldives rank
21st
Vegetable consumption per capita over time
- Libya
- Maldives
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 195.95 kilograms per year per capita against 193.31 kilograms per year per capita in Libya, a difference of 2.64 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 22nd and Maldives ranks 21st of 192 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 194.98 kilograms per year per capita | 121.44 kilograms per year per capita | 73.54 kilograms per year per capita | Libya |
| 2020s | 192.46 kilograms per year per capita | 163.81 kilograms per year per capita | 28.64 kilograms per year per capita | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vegetable consumption per capita, Libya or Maldives?
- Maldives, at 195.95 kilograms per year per capita against 193.31 kilograms per year per capita in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in vegetable consumption per capita between Libya and Maldives?
- 2.64 kilograms per year per capita, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Maldives?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Maldives rank globally for vegetable consumption per capita?
- Libya ranks 22nd and Maldives ranks 21st of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Vegetable consumption per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.