Laos vs Libya: Vegetable consumption per capita
Laos
201.53 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Libya
193.31 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Laos rank
19th
Libya rank
22nd
Vegetable consumption per capita over time
- Laos
- Libya
How they compare
Laos currently reports 201.53 kilograms per year per capita against 193.31 kilograms per year per capita in Libya, a difference of 8.22 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Libya ahead.
Laos ranks 19th and Libya ranks 22nd of 192 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 206.79 kilograms per year per capita | 194.98 kilograms per year per capita | 11.82 kilograms per year per capita | Laos |
| 2020s | 202.55 kilograms per year per capita | 192.46 kilograms per year per capita | 10.09 kilograms per year per capita | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vegetable consumption per capita, Laos or Libya?
- Laos, at 201.53 kilograms per year per capita against 193.31 kilograms per year per capita in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in vegetable consumption per capita between Laos and Libya?
- 8.22 kilograms per year per capita, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Libya?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Laos and Libya rank globally for vegetable consumption per capita?
- Laos ranks 19th and Libya ranks 22nd of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Vegetable consumption per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.