Hong Kong vs Qatar: Vegetable consumption per capita
Hong Kong
172.56 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Qatar
173.75 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
33rd
Qatar rank
30th
Vegetable consumption per capita over time
- Hong Kong
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 173.75 kilograms per year per capita against 172.56 kilograms per year per capita in Hong Kong, a difference of 1.19 kilograms per year per capita.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 33rd and Qatar ranks 30th of 192 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 162.82 kilograms per year per capita | 202.43 kilograms per year per capita | 39.61 kilograms per year per capita | Qatar |
| 2020s | 173.12 kilograms per year per capita | 191.03 kilograms per year per capita | 17.91 kilograms per year per capita | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vegetable consumption per capita, Hong Kong or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 173.75 kilograms per year per capita against 172.56 kilograms per year per capita in Hong Kong as of 2023.
- What is the difference in vegetable consumption per capita between Hong Kong and Qatar?
- 1.19 kilograms per year per capita, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Qatar?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong and Qatar rank globally for vegetable consumption per capita?
- Hong Kong ranks 33rd and Qatar ranks 30th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Vegetable consumption per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.