Costa Rica vs United Arab Emirates: Vegetable consumption per capita

Costa Rica
71.77 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
United Arab Emirates
70.94 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
118th
United Arab Emirates rank
120th

Vegetable consumption per capita over time

  • Costa Rica
  • United Arab Emirates
0100200300196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 71.77 kilograms per year per capita against 70.94 kilograms per year per capita in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.83 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 118th and United Arab Emirates ranks 120th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1960s 18.5 kilograms per year per capita 22.14 kilograms per year per capita 3.64 kilograms per year per capita United Arab Emirates
1970s 19.59 kilograms per year per capita 122.84 kilograms per year per capita 103.25 kilograms per year per capita United Arab Emirates
1980s 22.3 kilograms per year per capita 260.68 kilograms per year per capita 238.38 kilograms per year per capita United Arab Emirates
1990s 36.06 kilograms per year per capita 238.94 kilograms per year per capita 202.88 kilograms per year per capita United Arab Emirates
2000s 48.54 kilograms per year per capita 135.97 kilograms per year per capita 87.44 kilograms per year per capita United Arab Emirates
2010s 90.1 kilograms per year per capita 80.11 kilograms per year per capita 9.99 kilograms per year per capita Costa Rica
2020s 84.38 kilograms per year per capita 106.69 kilograms per year per capita 22.3 kilograms per year per capita United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetable consumption per capita, Costa Rica or United Arab Emirates?
Costa Rica, at 71.77 kilograms per year per capita against 70.94 kilograms per year per capita in United Arab Emirates as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetable consumption per capita between Costa Rica and United Arab Emirates?
0.83 kilograms per year per capita, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and United Arab Emirates?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and United Arab Emirates rank globally for vegetable consumption per capita?
Costa Rica ranks 118th and United Arab Emirates ranks 120th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Vegetable consumption per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs United Arab Emirates: Vegetable consumption per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/vegetable-consumption-per-capita/costa-rica/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/vegetable-consumption-per-capita/costa-rica/united-arab-emirates/">Costa Rica vs United Arab Emirates: Vegetable consumption per capita</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetable consumption per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.