Comoros vs Rwanda: Vegetable consumption per capita
Comoros
44.56 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Rwanda
45.54 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Comoros rank
149th
Rwanda rank
148th
Vegetable consumption per capita over time
- Comoros
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 45.54 kilograms per year per capita against 44.56 kilograms per year per capita in Comoros, a difference of 0.98 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Rwanda ahead.
Comoros ranks 149th and Rwanda ranks 148th of 191 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20.94 kilograms per year per capita | 49.33 kilograms per year per capita | 28.39 kilograms per year per capita | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 43.98 kilograms per year per capita | 46.69 kilograms per year per capita | 2.7 kilograms per year per capita | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vegetable consumption per capita, Comoros or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 45.54 kilograms per year per capita against 44.56 kilograms per year per capita in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in vegetable consumption per capita between Comoros and Rwanda?
- 0.98 kilograms per year per capita, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Rwanda?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Rwanda rank globally for vegetable consumption per capita?
- Comoros ranks 149th and Rwanda ranks 148th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Vegetable consumption per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.