Austria vs Qatar: Vegetable consumption per capita
Austria
178.01 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Qatar
173.75 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Austria rank
28th
Qatar rank
30th
Vegetable consumption per capita over time
- Austria
- Qatar
How they compare
Austria currently reports 178.01 kilograms per year per capita against 173.75 kilograms per year per capita in Qatar, a difference of 4.26 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Qatar ahead.
Austria ranks 28th and Qatar ranks 30th of 191 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 165.73 kilograms per year per capita | 202.43 kilograms per year per capita | 36.7 kilograms per year per capita | Qatar |
| 2020s | 167.29 kilograms per year per capita | 191.03 kilograms per year per capita | 23.74 kilograms per year per capita | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vegetable consumption per capita, Austria or Qatar?
- Austria, at 178.01 kilograms per year per capita against 173.75 kilograms per year per capita in Qatar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in vegetable consumption per capita between Austria and Qatar?
- 4.26 kilograms per year per capita, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Qatar?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Qatar rank globally for vegetable consumption per capita?
- Austria ranks 28th and Qatar ranks 30th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Vegetable consumption per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.