How many years of comparable data are there for United Kingdom and Zambia?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

United Kingdom vs Zambia: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP

United Kingdom

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Zambia

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2023

United Kingdom rank

125th

Zambia rank

122nd

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP over time

United Kingdom
Zambia

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in United Kingdom, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was United Kingdom ahead.

United Kingdom ranks 125th and Zambia ranks 122nd of 193 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, United Kingdom averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	United Kingdom	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	United Kingdom
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Zambia
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Zambia
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	United Kingdom
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	United Kingdom
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, per unit of gdp, United Kingdom or Zambia?: Zambia, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in United Kingdom as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, per unit of gdp between United Kingdom and Zambia?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United Kingdom and Zambia?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do United Kingdom and Zambia rank globally for value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, per unit of gdp?: United Kingdom ranks 125th and Zambia ranks 122nd of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United Kingdom vs Zambia: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/united-kingdom/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/united-kingdom/zambia/">United Kingdom vs Zambia: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 194 places, 9,262 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$ divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.