Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
0.101 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia
0.1255 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
78th
Serbia rank
75th

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Serbia
00.050.10.15197019962023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 0.1255 million USD per square kilometre against 0.101 million USD per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0245 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 78th and Serbia ranks 75th of 194 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0836 million USD per square kilometre 0.084 million USD per square kilometre 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 0.1211 million USD per square kilometre 0.0784 million USD per square kilometre 0.0427 million USD per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0952 million USD per square kilometre 0.1024 million USD per square kilometre 0.0072 million USD per square kilometre Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Serbia?
Serbia, at 0.1255 million USD per square kilometre against 0.101 million USD per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
0.0245 million USD per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Serbia rank globally for value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 78th and Serbia ranks 75th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/serbia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,598 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.