How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and East Timor?

34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Botswana vs East Timor: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, per square kilometre

Botswana

0.0019 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

East Timor

0.0023 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Botswana rank

177th

East Timor rank

176th

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, per square kilometre over time

Botswana
East Timor

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 0.0023 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0019 million USD per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes East Timor's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 177th and East Timor ranks 176th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and East Timor in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Botswana	East Timor	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0004 million USD per square kilometre	0.0005 million USD per square kilometre	0.0001 million USD per square kilometre	East Timor
2000s	0.0011 million USD per square kilometre	0.0008 million USD per square kilometre	0.0003 million USD per square kilometre	Botswana
2010s	0.0019 million USD per square kilometre	0.0011 million USD per square kilometre	0.0007 million USD per square kilometre	Botswana
2020s	0.0018 million USD per square kilometre	0.0023 million USD per square kilometre	0.0005 million USD per square kilometre	East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, per square kilometre, Botswana or East Timor?: East Timor, at 0.0023 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0019 million USD per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, per square kilometre between Botswana and East Timor?: 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and East Timor?: 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Botswana and East Timor rank globally for value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, per square kilometre?: Botswana ranks 177th and East Timor ranks 176th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs East Timor: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/timor-leste/">Botswana vs East Timor: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 195 places, 9,598 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.