Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per

Suriname
0.0037 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0048 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname rank
166th
Zimbabwe rank
163rd

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per over time

  • Suriname
  • Zimbabwe
0.0020.0040.006197019962023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0048 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0037 million USD per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0.0011 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Suriname ahead.

Suriname ranks 166th and Zimbabwe ranks 163rd of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Suriname averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Suriname Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0029 million USD per square kilometre 0.0026 million USD per square kilometre 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 0.0023 million USD per square kilometre 0.0036 million USD per square kilometre 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.0016 million USD per square kilometre 0.0047 million USD per square kilometre 0.0031 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0029 million USD per square kilometre 0.0031 million USD per square kilometre 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0061 million USD per square kilometre 0.0021 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0047 million USD per square kilometre 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, 2015 prices, per, Suriname or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0048 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0037 million USD per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, 2015 prices, per between Suriname and Zimbabwe?
0.0011 million USD per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Suriname and Zimbabwe rank globally for value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, 2015 prices, per?
Suriname ranks 166th and Zimbabwe ranks 163rd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/suriname/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/suriname/zimbabwe/">Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,598 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.