San Marino vs Singapore: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per

San Marino
9.71 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
112.18 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
San Marino rank
4th
Singapore rank
2nd

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per over time

  • San Marino
  • Singapore
0255075100125197019962023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 112.18 million USD per square kilometre against 9.71 million USD per square kilometre in San Marino, a difference of 102.47 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 11.6 times San Marino's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

San Marino ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 2nd of 194 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade San Marino Singapore Difference Ahead
1970s 4.11 million USD per square kilometre 6.87 million USD per square kilometre 2.76 million USD per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 5.51 million USD per square kilometre 13.97 million USD per square kilometre 8.46 million USD per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 8.12 million USD per square kilometre 29.72 million USD per square kilometre 21.6 million USD per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 10.46 million USD per square kilometre 51.12 million USD per square kilometre 40.66 million USD per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 7.25 million USD per square kilometre 83.64 million USD per square kilometre 76.39 million USD per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 8.94 million USD per square kilometre 111.09 million USD per square kilometre 102.15 million USD per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, 2015 prices, per, San Marino or Singapore?
Singapore, at 112.18 million USD per square kilometre against 9.71 million USD per square kilometre in San Marino as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, 2015 prices, per between San Marino and Singapore?
102.47 million USD per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Singapore?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do San Marino and Singapore rank globally for value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, 2015 prices, per?
San Marino ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 2nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

San Marino vs Singapore: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/san-marino/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/san-marino/singapore/">San Marino vs Singapore: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,598 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.