How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Pakistan?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs Pakistan: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per

Latvia

0.0569 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Pakistan

0.0617 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia rank

92nd

Pakistan rank

90th

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per over time

Latvia
Pakistan

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0.0617 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0569 million USD per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.0048 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 92nd and Pakistan ranks 90th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	Pakistan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0315 million USD per square kilometre	0.0147 million USD per square kilometre	0.0168 million USD per square kilometre	Latvia
2000s	0.0435 million USD per square kilometre	0.0294 million USD per square kilometre	0.0141 million USD per square kilometre	Latvia
2010s	0.0469 million USD per square kilometre	0.0469 million USD per square kilometre	0 million USD per square kilometre	Latvia
2020s	0.0571 million USD per square kilometre	0.0597 million USD per square kilometre	0.0026 million USD per square kilometre	Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, 2015 prices, per, Latvia or Pakistan?: Pakistan, at 0.0617 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0569 million USD per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, 2015 prices, per between Latvia and Pakistan?: 0.0048 million USD per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Pakistan?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Pakistan rank globally for value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, 2015 prices, per?: Latvia ranks 92nd and Pakistan ranks 90th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Pakistan: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/latvia/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/latvia/pakistan/">Latvia vs Pakistan: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 195 places, 9,598 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.