Eswatini vs Guatemala: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per

Eswatini
0.0902 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
0.1069 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
73rd
Guatemala rank
71st

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per over time

  • Eswatini
  • Guatemala
00.0250.050.0750.1197019962023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.1069 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0902 million USD per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0167 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 73rd and Guatemala ranks 71st of 194 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Guatemala Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0047 million USD per square kilometre 0.0314 million USD per square kilometre 0.0267 million USD per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 0.0155 million USD per square kilometre 0.0404 million USD per square kilometre 0.0249 million USD per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 0.0421 million USD per square kilometre 0.0485 million USD per square kilometre 0.0065 million USD per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 0.054 million USD per square kilometre 0.0623 million USD per square kilometre 0.0083 million USD per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 0.0733 million USD per square kilometre 0.0818 million USD per square kilometre 0.0084 million USD per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 0.0851 million USD per square kilometre 0.1016 million USD per square kilometre 0.0164 million USD per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, 2015 prices, per, Eswatini or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 0.1069 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0902 million USD per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, 2015 prices, per between Eswatini and Guatemala?
0.0167 million USD per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guatemala?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Guatemala rank globally for value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, 2015 prices, per?
Eswatini ranks 73rd and Guatemala ranks 71st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Guatemala: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/guatemala/">Eswatini vs Guatemala: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,598 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.