Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per

Equatorial Guinea
0.0818 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia
0.0848 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
81st
Serbia rank
78th

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Serbia
00.020.040.060.080.1197019962023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 0.0848 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0818 million USD per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.003 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 81st and Serbia ranks 78th of 194 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0637 million USD per square kilometre 0.0669 million USD per square kilometre 0.0032 million USD per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 0.0884 million USD per square kilometre 0.068 million USD per square kilometre 0.0204 million USD per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.08 million USD per square kilometre 0.081 million USD per square kilometre 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, 2015 prices, per, Equatorial Guinea or Serbia?
Serbia, at 0.0848 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0818 million USD per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, 2015 prices, per between Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
0.003 million USD per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Serbia rank globally for value added (total manufacturing) — value us$, 2015 prices, per?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 81st and Serbia ranks 78th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/serbia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,598 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.