Equatorial Guinea vs Rwanda: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency

Equatorial Guinea
1.72 million million SLC
in 2023
Rwanda
1.61 million million SLC
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
37th
Rwanda rank
39th

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Rwanda
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M197019962023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1.72 million million SLC against 1.61 million million SLC in Rwanda, a difference of 104,660 million SLC.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Rwanda ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 37th and Rwanda ranks 39th of 199 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 281.11 million SLC 3,444 million SLC 3,163 million SLC Rwanda
1980s 1,104 million SLC 11,410 million SLC 10,307 million SLC Rwanda
1990s 16,233 million SLC 39,153 million SLC 22,920 million SLC Rwanda
2000s 555,364 million SLC 144,200 million SLC 411,164 million SLC Equatorial Guinea
2010s 1.79 million million SLC 463,400 million SLC 1.32 million million SLC Equatorial Guinea
2020s 1.59 million million SLC 1.21 million million SLC 381,115 million SLC Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency, Equatorial Guinea or Rwanda?
Equatorial Guinea, at 1.72 million million SLC against 1.61 million million SLC in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency between Equatorial Guinea and Rwanda?
104,660 million SLC, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Rwanda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Rwanda rank globally for value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 37th and Rwanda ranks 39th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Rwanda: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-standard-local-currency/equatorial-guinea/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-standard-local-currency/equatorial-guinea/rwanda/">Equatorial Guinea vs Rwanda: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
218 places, 10,797 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Macro Indicators database provides a selection of country-level macro indicators relating to total economy (Gross Domestic Product, Gross Fixed Capital Formation); agriculture activity; agriculture, forestry and fishing activity; total manufacturing activity; manufacturing of food products and beverages activity; manufacturing activity of tobacco products; and manufacturing activity of food, beverage and tobacco products.It releases time series for a selection of National Accounts variables, including gross domestic product, gross fixed capital formation, industry-level value added and gross output. The database also proposes additional indicators such as gross domestic product per capita, year-on-year growth rates and measures of industry contribution to gross domestic product. All data relating to Gross Domestic Product, Gross Fixed Capital Formation, agriculture, forestry and fishing activity, and to total manufacturing activity originates from the United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) National Accounts Estimates of Main Aggregates database, which consists of a complete and consistent set of time series of the main National Accounts aggregates of all UN Members States and other territories in the world for which National Accounts information is available. The UNSD database's content is based on the countries' official National Accounts data reported to UNSD through the annual National Accounts Questionnaire, supplemented with data estimates for any years and countries with incomplete or inconsistent information (See http://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/Introduction.asp). Data series relating to the sub-industry Agriculture activity are obtained from the UNSD national accounts Official Country Data databases while series on the Manufacturing activity of food and beverages products, manufacturing activity of tobacco products and manufacturing activity of food, beverages and tobacco products originates from the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) INDSTAT2 database. In order to ensure that sub-industry series are consistent in levels with National Accounts based series, which is needed to support comparability across industries (agriculture vs. agro-industry and sub-industries), UNIDO originating series are rescaled on UNSD National Accounts Estimates of Main Aggregates data series (See Section 17.5 for a more detailed description of the data processing steps).