China, Hong Kong SAR vs Namibia: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency

China, Hong Kong SAR
28,360 million SLC
in 2023
Namibia
25,595 million SLC
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
117th
Namibia rank
119th

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Namibia
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k197019962023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 28,360 million SLC against 25,595 million SLC in Namibia, a difference of 2,765 million SLC.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 117th and Namibia ranks 119th of 202 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Namibia Difference Ahead
1970s 10,507 million SLC 75 million SLC 10,432 million SLC China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 53,493 million SLC 350.49 million SLC 53,143 million SLC China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 75,453 million SLC 1,361 million SLC 74,091 million SLC China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 41,115 million SLC 5,557 million SLC 35,558 million SLC China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 28,742 million SLC 16,202 million SLC 12,541 million SLC China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 26,665 million SLC 21,846 million SLC 4,819 million SLC China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency, China, Hong Kong SAR or Namibia?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 28,360 million SLC against 25,595 million SLC in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency between China, Hong Kong SAR and Namibia?
2,765 million SLC, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Namibia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Namibia rank globally for value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 117th and Namibia ranks 119th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Namibia: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-standard-local-currency/china-hong-kong-sar/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-standard-local-currency/china-hong-kong-sar/namibia/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Namibia: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
218 places, 10,797 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Macro Indicators database provides a selection of country-level macro indicators relating to total economy (Gross Domestic Product, Gross Fixed Capital Formation); agriculture activity; agriculture, forestry and fishing activity; total manufacturing activity; manufacturing of food products and beverages activity; manufacturing activity of tobacco products; and manufacturing activity of food, beverage and tobacco products.It releases time series for a selection of National Accounts variables, including gross domestic product, gross fixed capital formation, industry-level value added and gross output. The database also proposes additional indicators such as gross domestic product per capita, year-on-year growth rates and measures of industry contribution to gross domestic product. All data relating to Gross Domestic Product, Gross Fixed Capital Formation, agriculture, forestry and fishing activity, and to total manufacturing activity originates from the United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) National Accounts Estimates of Main Aggregates database, which consists of a complete and consistent set of time series of the main National Accounts aggregates of all UN Members States and other territories in the world for which National Accounts information is available. The UNSD database's content is based on the countries' official National Accounts data reported to UNSD through the annual National Accounts Questionnaire, supplemented with data estimates for any years and countries with incomplete or inconsistent information (See http://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/Introduction.asp). Data series relating to the sub-industry Agriculture activity are obtained from the UNSD national accounts Official Country Data databases while series on the Manufacturing activity of food and beverages products, manufacturing activity of tobacco products and manufacturing activity of food, beverages and tobacco products originates from the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) INDSTAT2 database. In order to ensure that sub-industry series are consistent in levels with National Accounts based series, which is needed to support comparability across industries (agriculture vs. agro-industry and sub-industries), UNIDO originating series are rescaled on UNSD National Accounts Estimates of Main Aggregates data series (See Section 17.5 for a more detailed description of the data processing steps).