Lesotho vs Suriname: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency

Lesotho
0.18 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.2124 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho rank
145th
Suriname rank
143rd

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency over time

  • Lesotho
  • Suriname
00.050.10.150.2197019962023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.2124 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.18 million SLC per square kilometre in Lesotho, a difference of 0.0324 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.2 times Lesotho's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Lesotho ahead.

Lesotho ranks 145th and Suriname ranks 143rd of 194 countries.

Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Suriname Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0002 million SLC per square kilometre 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0002 million SLC per square kilometre Lesotho
1980s 0.0019 million SLC per square kilometre 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0019 million SLC per square kilometre Lesotho
1990s 0.0132 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0002 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0129 million SLC per square kilometre Lesotho
2000s 0.0704 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0078 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0625 million SLC per square kilometre Lesotho
2010s 0.1272 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0251 million SLC per square kilometre 0.102 million SLC per square kilometre Lesotho
2020s 0.1907 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1281 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0626 million SLC per square kilometre Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency, Lesotho or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.2124 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.18 million SLC per square kilometre in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency between Lesotho and Suriname?
0.0324 million SLC per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Suriname?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and Suriname rank globally for value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency?
Lesotho ranks 145th and Suriname ranks 143rd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Suriname: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/suriname/">Lesotho vs Suriname: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,578 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.