Cote d'Ivoire vs Jamaica: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency

Cote d'Ivoire
22.43 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
21.99 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire rank
30th
Jamaica rank
31st

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Jamaica
05101520197019962023

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 22.43 million SLC per square kilometre against 21.99 million SLC per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 0.44 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 30th and Jamaica ranks 31st of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 3 and Jamaica in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Jamaica Difference Ahead
1970s 0.3709 million SLC per square kilometre 0.038 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3329 million SLC per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1980s 1.23 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2104 million SLC per square kilometre 1.02 million SLC per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1990s 3.11 million SLC per square kilometre 2.16 million SLC per square kilometre 0.9488 million SLC per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2000s 4.64 million SLC per square kilometre 5.17 million SLC per square kilometre 0.5304 million SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 9.07 million SLC per square kilometre 11.71 million SLC per square kilometre 2.63 million SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 18.24 million SLC per square kilometre 18.44 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1991 million SLC per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency, Cote d'Ivoire or Jamaica?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 22.43 million SLC per square kilometre against 21.99 million SLC per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency between Cote d'Ivoire and Jamaica?
0.44 million SLC per square kilometre, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Jamaica?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Jamaica rank globally for value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 30th and Jamaica ranks 31st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Jamaica: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/jamaica/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Jamaica: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,578 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.