Costa Rica vs Hungary: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency

Costa Rica
125.52 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary
141.72 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
13th
Hungary rank
11th

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Hungary
050100150197019962023

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 141.72 million SLC per square kilometre against 125.52 million SLC per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 16.2 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Hungary ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 13th and Hungary ranks 11th of 194 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Hungary Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0862 million SLC per square kilometre 1.56 million SLC per square kilometre 1.47 million SLC per square kilometre Hungary
1980s 1.09 million SLC per square kilometre 2.82 million SLC per square kilometre 1.73 million SLC per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 7.82 million SLC per square kilometre 12.58 million SLC per square kilometre 4.76 million SLC per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 31.48 million SLC per square kilometre 44.36 million SLC per square kilometre 12.89 million SLC per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 70.68 million SLC per square kilometre 72.12 million SLC per square kilometre 1.44 million SLC per square kilometre Hungary
2020s 112.24 million SLC per square kilometre 114.2 million SLC per square kilometre 1.95 million SLC per square kilometre Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency, Costa Rica or Hungary?
Hungary, at 141.72 million SLC per square kilometre against 125.52 million SLC per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency between Costa Rica and Hungary?
16.2 million SLC per square kilometre, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Hungary?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Hungary rank globally for value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency?
Costa Rica ranks 13th and Hungary ranks 11th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Hungary: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/hungary/">Costa Rica vs Hungary: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,578 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.