Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency

Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0002 million SLC per person
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0003 million SLC per person
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
189th
Zimbabwe rank
186th

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency over time

  • Turks and Caicos Islands
  • Zimbabwe
0000.0010.001197019962023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0003 million SLC per person against 0.0002 million SLC per person in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0001 million SLC per person.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.6 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 189th and Zimbabwe ranks 186th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Turks and Caicos Islands averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turks and Caicos Islands Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person Zimbabwe
1980s 0.0003 million SLC per person 0.0002 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person Turks and Caicos Islands
1990s 0.0006 million SLC per person 0.0002 million SLC per person 0.0004 million SLC per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0.0005 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0004 million SLC per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.0002 million SLC per person 0.0002 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 0.0002 million SLC per person 0.0003 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency, Turks and Caicos Islands or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0003 million SLC per person against 0.0002 million SLC per person in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency between Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe?
0.0001 million SLC per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe rank globally for value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency?
Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 189th and Zimbabwe ranks 186th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/turks-and-caicos-islands/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/turks-and-caicos-islands/zimbabwe/">Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,747 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.