Antigua and Barbuda vs Eswatini: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency

Antigua and Barbuda
5.33 % change on previous year
in 2023
Eswatini
4.97 % change on previous year
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
124th
Eswatini rank
127th

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Eswatini
-50050100197119972023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 5.33 % change on previous year against 4.97 % change on previous year in Eswatini, a difference of 0.36 % change on previous year.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Eswatini ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 124th and Eswatini ranks 127th of 231 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 15.88 % change on previous year 24.22 % change on previous year 8.34 % change on previous year Eswatini
1980s 9.81 % change on previous year 26.93 % change on previous year 17.12 % change on previous year Eswatini
1990s 2.55 % change on previous year 14.78 % change on previous year 12.23 % change on previous year Eswatini
2000s 9.49 % change on previous year 12.1 % change on previous year 2.61 % change on previous year Eswatini
2010s 5.25 % change on previous year 6.26 % change on previous year 1.01 % change on previous year Eswatini
2020s 0.2713 % change on previous year 4.98 % change on previous year 4.71 % change on previous year Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency, Antigua and Barbuda or Eswatini?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 5.33 % change on previous year against 4.97 % change on previous year in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency between Antigua and Barbuda and Eswatini?
0.36 % change on previous year, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Eswatini?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Eswatini rank globally for value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 124th and Eswatini ranks 127th of 231 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Eswatini: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-standard-local-currency-annual-growth-rate/antigua-and-barbuda/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-standard-local-currency-annual-growth-rate/antigua-and-barbuda/eswatini/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Eswatini: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
232 places, 11,099 data points, 1971–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.