Guatemala vs Turkey: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency

Guatemala
0.8181 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkey
0.7513 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
91st
Turkey rank
93rd

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency over time

  • Guatemala
  • Turkey
00.20.40.60.8197019962023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.8181 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.7513 million SLC per square kilometre in Turkey, a difference of 0.0668 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Turkey's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 91st and Turkey ranks 93rd of 194 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Turkey Difference Ahead
1970s 0.2403 million SLC per square kilometre 0.063 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1773 million SLC per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 0.309 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1033 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2057 million SLC per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 0.3716 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1803 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1912 million SLC per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 0.4766 million SLC per square kilometre 0.273 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2036 million SLC per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 0.6259 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4879 million SLC per square kilometre 0.138 million SLC per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 0.7774 million SLC per square kilometre 0.6945 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0829 million SLC per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency, Guatemala or Turkey?
Guatemala, at 0.8181 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.7513 million SLC per square kilometre in Turkey as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency between Guatemala and Turkey?
0.0668 million SLC per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Turkey?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Turkey rank globally for value added (total manufacturing) — value standard local currency?
Guatemala ranks 91st and Turkey ranks 93rd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Turkey: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/guatemala/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-total-manufacturing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/guatemala/turkiye/">Guatemala vs Turkey: Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,578 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Total Manufacturing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.