South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre

South Sudan
115.33 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
191.14 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Sudan rank
178th
Zimbabwe rank
177th

Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • South Sudan
  • Zimbabwe
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196619942023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 191.14 current US$ per square kilometre against 115.33 current US$ per square kilometre in South Sudan, a difference of 75.81 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.7 times South Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.

South Sudan ranks 178th and Zimbabwe ranks 177th of 180 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Sudan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 671.21 current US$ per square kilometre 893.85 current US$ per square kilometre 222.64 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 274.3 current US$ per square kilometre 989.65 current US$ per square kilometre 715.35 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre, South Sudan or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 191.14 current US$ per square kilometre against 115.33 current US$ per square kilometre in South Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre between South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
75.81 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do South Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre?
South Sudan ranks 178th and Zimbabwe ranks 177th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/south-sudan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/south-sudan/zimbabwe/">South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves minus gold (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.