Russian Federation vs Solomon Islands: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre

Russian Federation
27,022 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands
24,293 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Russian Federation rank
123rd
Solomon Islands rank
126th

Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Solomon Islands
010.0k20.0k30.0k197720002023

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 27,022 current US$ per square kilometre against 24,293 current US$ per square kilometre in Solomon Islands, a difference of 2,729 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.1 times Solomon Islands's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Russian Federation ranks 123rd and Solomon Islands ranks 126th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 3 and Solomon Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 563.62 current US$ per square kilometre 1,136 current US$ per square kilometre 571.96 current US$ per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2000s 12,587 current US$ per square kilometre 2,643 current US$ per square kilometre 9,943 current US$ per square kilometre Russian Federation
2010s 24,498 current US$ per square kilometre 16,974 current US$ per square kilometre 7,525 current US$ per square kilometre Russian Federation
2020s 28,133 current US$ per square kilometre 23,872 current US$ per square kilometre 4,260 current US$ per square kilometre Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre, Russian Federation or Solomon Islands?
Russian Federation, at 27,022 current US$ per square kilometre against 24,293 current US$ per square kilometre in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre between Russian Federation and Solomon Islands?
2,729 current US$ per square kilometre, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Solomon Islands?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Russian Federation and Solomon Islands rank globally for total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre?
Russian Federation ranks 123rd and Solomon Islands ranks 126th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Solomon Islands: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/russian-federation/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/russian-federation/solomon-islands/">Russian Federation vs Solomon Islands: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves minus gold (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.