Namibia vs Zambia: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre

Namibia
3,591 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
4,269 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
162nd
Zambia rank
160th

Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Namibia
  • Zambia
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196519942023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 4,269 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,591 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 678 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Zambia ahead.

Namibia ranks 162nd and Zambia ranks 160th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 271.98 current US$ per square kilometre 242.09 current US$ per square kilometre 29.89 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 788.19 current US$ per square kilometre 928.9 current US$ per square kilometre 140.72 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 2,195 current US$ per square kilometre 3,180 current US$ per square kilometre 985.55 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 3,248 current US$ per square kilometre 3,396 current US$ per square kilometre 148.41 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre, Namibia or Zambia?
Zambia, at 4,269 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,591 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre between Namibia and Zambia?
678 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zambia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Zambia rank globally for total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre?
Namibia ranks 162nd and Zambia ranks 160th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Zambia: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/namibia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/namibia/zambia/">Namibia vs Zambia: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves minus gold (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.