Malta vs Mauritius: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre

Malta
3.76 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
3.22 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
11th
Mauritius rank
14th

Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Malta
  • Mauritius
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 3.76 million current US$ per square kilometre against 3.22 million current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 546,600 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 11th and Mauritius ranks 14th of 180 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 6 and Mauritius in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 274,622 current US$ per square kilometre 9,702 current US$ per square kilometre 264,920 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1970s 1.58 million current US$ per square kilometre 37,572 current US$ per square kilometre 1.54 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 3.60 million current US$ per square kilometre 82,482 current US$ per square kilometre 3.52 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 4.82 million current US$ per square kilometre 379,219 current US$ per square kilometre 4.44 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 6.58 million current US$ per square kilometre 712,063 current US$ per square kilometre 5.86 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 2.16 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.07 million current US$ per square kilometre 96,572 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 3.49 million current US$ per square kilometre 3.49 million current US$ per square kilometre 1,512 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre, Malta or Mauritius?
Malta, at 3.76 million current US$ per square kilometre against 3.22 million current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre between Malta and Mauritius?
546,600 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malta and Mauritius rank globally for total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre?
Malta ranks 11th and Mauritius ranks 14th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Mauritius: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/mauritius/">Malta vs Mauritius: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves minus gold (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.