Maldives vs Seychelles: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre

Maldives
1.98 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Seychelles
1.48 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Maldives rank
18th
Seychelles rank
20th

Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Maldives
  • Seychelles
01.0M2.0M3.0M197319982023

How they compare

Maldives currently reports 1.98 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.48 million current US$ per square kilometre in Seychelles, a difference of 497,290 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Maldives's figure about 1.3 times Seychelles's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Seychelles ahead.

Maldives ranks 18th and Seychelles ranks 20th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 5 and Seychelles in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Maldives Seychelles Difference Ahead
1970s 1,145 current US$ per square kilometre 21,418 current US$ per square kilometre 20,273 current US$ per square kilometre Seychelles
1980s 28,742 current US$ per square kilometre 24,232 current US$ per square kilometre 4,510 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
1990s 200,495 current US$ per square kilometre 58,362 current US$ per square kilometre 142,133 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
2000s 646,660 current US$ per square kilometre 155,864 current US$ per square kilometre 490,795 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
2010s 1.69 million current US$ per square kilometre 971,440 current US$ per square kilometre 714,133 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
2020s 2.68 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.40 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.28 million current US$ per square kilometre Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre, Maldives or Seychelles?
Maldives, at 1.98 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.48 million current US$ per square kilometre in Seychelles as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre between Maldives and Seychelles?
497,290 current US$ per square kilometre, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Seychelles?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Maldives and Seychelles rank globally for total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre?
Maldives ranks 18th and Seychelles ranks 20th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Maldives vs Seychelles: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/maldives/seychelles/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/maldives/seychelles/">Maldives vs Seychelles: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves minus gold (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.