Malawi vs Sierra Leone: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre

Malawi
6,306 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Sierra Leone
6,868 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
152nd
Sierra Leone rank
151st

Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Malawi
  • Sierra Leone
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 6,868 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,306 current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 562 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

Malawi ranks 152nd and Sierra Leone ranks 151st of 180 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 3 and Sierra Leone in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1960s 238.98 current US$ per square kilometre 336.49 current US$ per square kilometre 97.51 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
1970s 599.56 current US$ per square kilometre 552.95 current US$ per square kilometre 46.6 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1980s 614.52 current US$ per square kilometre 167.49 current US$ per square kilometre 447.04 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1990s 1,490 current US$ per square kilometre 397.05 current US$ per square kilometre 1,093 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 1,865 current US$ per square kilometre 2,179 current US$ per square kilometre 314.46 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
2010s 5,744 current US$ per square kilometre 7,088 current US$ per square kilometre 1,344 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
2020s 6,306 current US$ per square kilometre 9,805 current US$ per square kilometre 3,499 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre, Malawi or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 6,868 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,306 current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre between Malawi and Sierra Leone?
562 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Sierra Leone?
56 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2020.
How do Malawi and Sierra Leone rank globally for total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre?
Malawi ranks 152nd and Sierra Leone ranks 151st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Sierra Leone: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/sierra-leone/">Malawi vs Sierra Leone: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves minus gold (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.