Macau, China vs Singapore: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre

Macau, China
841.53 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
479.92 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China rank
1st
Singapore rank
2nd

Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Macau, China
  • Singapore
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B1.2B196119922023

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 841.53 million current US$ per square kilometre against 479.92 million current US$ per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 361.62 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 1.8 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 40 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Singapore ahead.

Macau, China ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 2nd of 180 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Macau, China averaged higher in 4 and Singapore in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macau, China Singapore Difference Ahead
1980s 8.21 million current US$ per square kilometre 22.11 million current US$ per square kilometre 13.90 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 92.70 million current US$ per square kilometre 86.26 million current US$ per square kilometre 6.44 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2000s 297.57 million current US$ per square kilometre 177.14 million current US$ per square kilometre 120.44 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2010s 677.47 million current US$ per square kilometre 365.56 million current US$ per square kilometre 311.91 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2020s 800.21 million current US$ per square kilometre 491.10 million current US$ per square kilometre 309.11 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre, Macau, China or Singapore?
Macau, China, at 841.53 million current US$ per square kilometre against 479.92 million current US$ per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre between Macau, China and Singapore?
361.62 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Singapore?
40 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2023.
How do Macau, China and Singapore rank globally for total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre?
Macau, China ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 2nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau, China vs Singapore: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/singapore/">Macau, China vs Singapore: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves minus gold (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.