Japan vs Kuwait: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre

Japan
3.40 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kuwait
2.66 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan rank
13th
Kuwait rank
15th

Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Japan
  • Kuwait
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 3.40 million current US$ per square kilometre against 2.66 million current US$ per square kilometre in Kuwait, a difference of 738,290 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.3 times Kuwait's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.

Japan ranks 13th and Kuwait ranks 15th of 180 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 5 and Kuwait in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Kuwait Difference Ahead
1960s 5,361 current US$ per square kilometre 3,597 current US$ per square kilometre 1,763 current US$ per square kilometre Japan
1970s 44,318 current US$ per square kilometre 76,636 current US$ per square kilometre 32,318 current US$ per square kilometre Kuwait
1980s 125,442 current US$ per square kilometre 245,962 current US$ per square kilometre 120,520 current US$ per square kilometre Kuwait
1990s 454,153 current US$ per square kilometre 221,781 current US$ per square kilometre 232,371 current US$ per square kilometre Japan
2000s 2.03 million current US$ per square kilometre 659,236 current US$ per square kilometre 1.37 million current US$ per square kilometre Japan
2010s 3.34 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.72 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.62 million current US$ per square kilometre Japan
2020s 3.51 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.64 million current US$ per square kilometre 868,480 current US$ per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre, Japan or Kuwait?
Japan, at 3.40 million current US$ per square kilometre against 2.66 million current US$ per square kilometre in Kuwait as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre between Japan and Kuwait?
738,290 current US$ per square kilometre, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Kuwait?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Japan and Kuwait rank globally for total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre?
Japan ranks 13th and Kuwait ranks 15th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Kuwait: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/japan/kuwait/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/japan/kuwait/">Japan vs Kuwait: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves minus gold (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.