Hong Kong, China vs San Marino: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre

Hong Kong, China
405.16 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
San Marino
13.93 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
3rd
San Marino rank
5th

Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • San Marino
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M500.0M199020062023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 405.16 million current US$ per square kilometre against 13.93 million current US$ per square kilometre in San Marino, a difference of 391.22 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 29.1 times San Marino's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd and San Marino ranks 5th of 180 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China San Marino Difference Ahead
1990s 67.45 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.87 million current US$ per square kilometre 64.57 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2000s 135.31 million current US$ per square kilometre 6.72 million current US$ per square kilometre 128.60 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 347.53 million current US$ per square kilometre 6.78 million current US$ per square kilometre 340.75 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 437.55 million current US$ per square kilometre 13.70 million current US$ per square kilometre 423.85 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre, Hong Kong, China or San Marino?
Hong Kong, China, at 405.16 million current US$ per square kilometre against 13.93 million current US$ per square kilometre in San Marino as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre between Hong Kong, China and San Marino?
391.22 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and San Marino?
30 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and San Marino rank globally for total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre?
Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd and San Marino ranks 5th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs San Marino: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/san-marino/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/san-marino/">Hong Kong, China vs San Marino: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves minus gold (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.