Gambia vs New Zealand: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre

Gambia
57,019 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
58,818 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
102nd
New Zealand rank
101st

Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Gambia
  • New Zealand
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 58,818 current US$ per square kilometre against 57,019 current US$ per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 1,799 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1964 it was New Zealand ahead.

Gambia ranks 102nd and New Zealand ranks 101st of 180 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 727.27 current US$ per square kilometre 757.83 current US$ per square kilometre 30.56 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 1,742 current US$ per square kilometre 2,099 current US$ per square kilometre 356.82 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 1,026 current US$ per square kilometre 7,108 current US$ per square kilometre 6,081 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 9,316 current US$ per square kilometre 15,448 current US$ per square kilometre 6,133 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 11,540 current US$ per square kilometre 35,079 current US$ per square kilometre 23,540 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 18,265 current US$ per square kilometre 65,382 current US$ per square kilometre 47,118 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 53,977 current US$ per square kilometre 56,715 current US$ per square kilometre 2,738 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre, Gambia or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 58,818 current US$ per square kilometre against 57,019 current US$ per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre between Gambia and New Zealand?
1,799 current US$ per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and New Zealand?
60 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Gambia and New Zealand rank globally for total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre?
Gambia ranks 102nd and New Zealand ranks 101st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs New Zealand: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/new-zealand/">Gambia vs New Zealand: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves minus gold (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.