Ecuador vs Pakistan: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre

Ecuador
10,867 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
12,249 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
142nd
Pakistan rank
140th

Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Pakistan
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 12,249 current US$ per square kilometre against 10,867 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 1,382 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Pakistan ahead.

Ecuador ranks 142nd and Pakistan ranks 140th of 180 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 4 and Pakistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 131.44 current US$ per square kilometre 257.88 current US$ per square kilometre 126.43 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1970s 1,248 current US$ per square kilometre 410.8 current US$ per square kilometre 836.85 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 2,166 current US$ per square kilometre 1,054 current US$ per square kilometre 1,112 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 5,444 current US$ per square kilometre 1,533 current US$ per square kilometre 3,911 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 6,851 current US$ per square kilometre 11,429 current US$ per square kilometre 4,578 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 8,978 current US$ per square kilometre 17,113 current US$ per square kilometre 8,135 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 20,643 current US$ per square kilometre 15,963 current US$ per square kilometre 4,680 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 12,249 current US$ per square kilometre against 10,867 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Pakistan?
1,382 current US$ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Pakistan rank globally for total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 142nd and Pakistan ranks 140th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Pakistan: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/pakistan/">Ecuador vs Pakistan: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves minus gold (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.