Chile vs Sri Lanka: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre

Chile
62,411 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
70,708 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
99th
Sri Lanka rank
96th

Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Sri Lanka
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 70,708 current US$ per square kilometre against 62,411 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 8,297 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Chile ranks 99th and Sri Lanka ranks 96th of 180 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 134.69 current US$ per square kilometre 1,001 current US$ per square kilometre 866.39 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1970s 630.4 current US$ per square kilometre 2,669 current US$ per square kilometre 2,038 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 3,576 current US$ per square kilometre 5,232 current US$ per square kilometre 1,656 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 16,432 current US$ per square kilometre 24,555 current US$ per square kilometre 8,123 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 23,954 current US$ per square kilometre 38,580 current US$ per square kilometre 14,627 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 52,711 current US$ per square kilometre 104,030 current US$ per square kilometre 51,319 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 59,178 current US$ per square kilometre 58,446 current US$ per square kilometre 731.8 current US$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 70,708 current US$ per square kilometre against 62,411 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Sri Lanka?
8,297 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Sri Lanka rank globally for total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 99th and Sri Lanka ranks 96th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Sri Lanka: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/sri-lanka/">Chile vs Sri Lanka: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves minus gold (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.