Botswana vs Suriname: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre

Botswana
8,392 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
7,782 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
145th
Suriname rank
147th

Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Suriname
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 8,392 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,782 current US$ per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 610 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Suriname ahead.

Botswana ranks 145th and Suriname ranks 147th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and Suriname in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Suriname Difference Ahead
1970s 254.56 current US$ per square kilometre 788.42 current US$ per square kilometre 533.86 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 1,874 current US$ per square kilometre 459.37 current US$ per square kilometre 1,414 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 8,277 current US$ per square kilometre 361.24 current US$ per square kilometre 7,916 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 12,458 current US$ per square kilometre 1,491 current US$ per square kilometre 10,967 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 13,180 current US$ per square kilometre 3,501 current US$ per square kilometre 9,679 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 8,283 current US$ per square kilometre 5,858 current US$ per square kilometre 2,425 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre, Botswana or Suriname?
Botswana, at 8,392 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,782 current US$ per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre between Botswana and Suriname?
610 current US$ per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Suriname?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Suriname rank globally for total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 145th and Suriname ranks 147th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Suriname: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/suriname/">Botswana vs Suriname: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves minus gold (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.