Barbados vs Qatar: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre

Barbados
3.73 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Qatar
3.90 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
12th
Qatar rank
10th

Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Qatar
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196619942023

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 3.90 million current US$ per square kilometre against 3.73 million current US$ per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 168,250 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 12th and Qatar ranks 10th of 180 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 6 and Qatar in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Qatar Difference Ahead
1960s 28,692 current US$ per square kilometre 645.99 current US$ per square kilometre 28,046 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 84,994 current US$ per square kilometre 8,882 current US$ per square kilometre 76,112 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 288,023 current US$ per square kilometre 38,795 current US$ per square kilometre 249,228 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 495,943 current US$ per square kilometre 68,342 current US$ per square kilometre 427,601 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 1.59 million current US$ per square kilometre 497,314 current US$ per square kilometre 1.09 million current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 1.48 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.70 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.22 million current US$ per square kilometre Qatar
2020s 3.58 million current US$ per square kilometre 3.55 million current US$ per square kilometre 26,165 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre, Barbados or Qatar?
Qatar, at 3.90 million current US$ per square kilometre against 3.73 million current US$ per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre between Barbados and Qatar?
168,250 current US$ per square kilometre, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Qatar?
58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Qatar rank globally for total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 12th and Qatar ranks 10th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Qatar: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/qatar/">Barbados vs Qatar: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves minus gold (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.