Barbados vs Malta: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre

Barbados
3.73 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
3.76 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
12th
Malta rank
11th

Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Malta
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 3.76 million current US$ per square kilometre against 3.73 million current US$ per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 29,020 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Malta ahead.

Barbados ranks 12th and Malta ranks 11th of 180 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 28,692 current US$ per square kilometre 347,977 current US$ per square kilometre 319,285 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1970s 84,994 current US$ per square kilometre 1.58 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.49 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 288,023 current US$ per square kilometre 3.60 million current US$ per square kilometre 3.31 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 495,943 current US$ per square kilometre 4.82 million current US$ per square kilometre 4.32 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 1.59 million current US$ per square kilometre 6.58 million current US$ per square kilometre 4.99 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 1.48 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.16 million current US$ per square kilometre 686,340 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 3.58 million current US$ per square kilometre 3.49 million current US$ per square kilometre 92,705 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre, Barbados or Malta?
Malta, at 3.76 million current US$ per square kilometre against 3.73 million current US$ per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre between Barbados and Malta?
29,020 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Malta?
58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Malta rank globally for total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 12th and Malta ranks 11th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Malta: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/malta/">Barbados vs Malta: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves minus gold (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.