Australia vs Suriname: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre

Australia
7,359 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
7,782 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
149th
Suriname rank
147th

Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Suriname
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 7,782 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,359 current US$ per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 423 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 149th and Suriname ranks 147th of 180 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 6 and Suriname in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 168.04 current US$ per square kilometre 73.82 current US$ per square kilometre 94.22 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
1970s 404.23 current US$ per square kilometre 510.94 current US$ per square kilometre 106.7 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 979.81 current US$ per square kilometre 459.37 current US$ per square kilometre 520.43 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
1990s 1,894 current US$ per square kilometre 361.24 current US$ per square kilometre 1,532 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
2000s 4,095 current US$ per square kilometre 1,491 current US$ per square kilometre 2,603 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
2010s 6,358 current US$ per square kilometre 3,501 current US$ per square kilometre 2,857 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
2020s 6,596 current US$ per square kilometre 5,858 current US$ per square kilometre 737.3 current US$ per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre, Australia or Suriname?
Suriname, at 7,782 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,359 current US$ per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre between Australia and Suriname?
423 current US$ per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Suriname rank globally for total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 149th and Suriname ranks 147th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Suriname: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/suriname/">Australia vs Suriname: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves minus gold (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.