Argentina vs Malawi: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre

Argentina
6,938 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
6,306 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Argentina rank
150th
Malawi rank
152nd

Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Malawi
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 6,938 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,306 current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 632 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Malawi ahead.

Argentina ranks 150th and Malawi ranks 152nd of 180 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 6 and Malawi in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 146.05 current US$ per square kilometre 238.98 current US$ per square kilometre 92.94 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1970s 824.8 current US$ per square kilometre 599.56 current US$ per square kilometre 225.25 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 999.16 current US$ per square kilometre 614.52 current US$ per square kilometre 384.64 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 5,643 current US$ per square kilometre 1,490 current US$ per square kilometre 4,153 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 10,119 current US$ per square kilometre 1,865 current US$ per square kilometre 8,255 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 14,944 current US$ per square kilometre 5,744 current US$ per square kilometre 9,200 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 13,027 current US$ per square kilometre 6,306 current US$ per square kilometre 6,721 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre, Argentina or Malawi?
Argentina, at 6,938 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,306 current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre between Argentina and Malawi?
632 current US$ per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Malawi?
56 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2020.
How do Argentina and Malawi rank globally for total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 150th and Malawi ranks 152nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Malawi: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/malawi/">Argentina vs Malawi: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves minus gold (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.