Argentina vs Australia: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre

Argentina
6,938 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia
7,359 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
150th
Australia rank
149th

Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Australia
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 7,359 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,938 current US$ per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 421 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Argentina ranks 150th and Australia ranks 149th of 180 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 6 and Australia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Australia Difference Ahead
1960s 102.41 current US$ per square kilometre 168.04 current US$ per square kilometre 65.63 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
1970s 824.8 current US$ per square kilometre 404.23 current US$ per square kilometre 420.57 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 999.16 current US$ per square kilometre 979.81 current US$ per square kilometre 19.35 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 5,643 current US$ per square kilometre 1,894 current US$ per square kilometre 3,749 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 10,119 current US$ per square kilometre 4,095 current US$ per square kilometre 6,025 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 14,944 current US$ per square kilometre 6,358 current US$ per square kilometre 8,586 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 12,084 current US$ per square kilometre 6,596 current US$ per square kilometre 5,489 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre, Argentina or Australia?
Australia, at 7,359 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,938 current US$ per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre between Argentina and Australia?
421 current US$ per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Australia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Australia rank globally for total reserves minus gold (current us$), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 150th and Australia ranks 149th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Australia: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/australia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-minus-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/australia/">Argentina vs Australia: Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves minus gold (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves minus gold (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.