Mozambique vs Tanzania: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre

Mozambique
4,625 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
5,701 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2018
Mozambique rank
159th
Tanzania rank
156th

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Mozambique
  • Tanzania
02.0k4.0k6.0k196619942023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 5,701 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre against 4,625 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 1,076 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.2 times Mozambique's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Mozambique ahead.

Mozambique ranks 159th and Tanzania ranks 156th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Tanzania Difference Ahead
1980s 138.41 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 50.37 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 88.04 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
1990s 438.35 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 461.53 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 23.19 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2000s 1,537 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 2,437 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 900.31 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 3,601 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 5,032 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 1,431 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per square kilometre, Mozambique or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 5,701 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre against 4,625 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2018.
What is the difference in total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per square kilometre between Mozambique and Tanzania?
1,076 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Tanzania?
35 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2018.
How do Mozambique and Tanzania rank globally for total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per square kilometre?
Mozambique ranks 159th and Tanzania ranks 156th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Tanzania: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/tanzania/">Mozambique vs Tanzania: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.