Madagascar vs Namibia: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre

Madagascar
4,524 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
3,591 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Madagascar rank
161st
Namibia rank
164th

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Madagascar
  • Namibia
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196219922023

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 4,524 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,591 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 933 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Madagascar ahead.

Madagascar ranks 161st and Namibia ranks 164th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 272.28 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 245.53 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 26.74 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
2000s 1,004 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 788.19 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 216.06 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre Madagascar
2010s 2,030 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 2,195 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 165 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 3,913 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 3,248 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 665.83 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per square kilometre, Madagascar or Namibia?
Madagascar, at 4,524 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,591 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per square kilometre between Madagascar and Namibia?
933 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Namibia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Madagascar and Namibia rank globally for total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per square kilometre?
Madagascar ranks 161st and Namibia ranks 164th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Namibia: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/madagascar/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/madagascar/namibia/">Madagascar vs Namibia: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.