Eswatini vs Tajikistan: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre

Eswatini
27,864 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tajikistan
23,804 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
127th
Tajikistan rank
130th

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Tajikistan
020.0k40.0k60.0k197419982023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 27,864 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre against 23,804 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre in Tajikistan, a difference of 4,060 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Tajikistan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 127th and Tajikistan ranks 130th of 180 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1990s 19,949 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 362.44 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 19,587 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 26,755 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 1,046 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 25,709 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 35,509 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 5,684 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 29,825 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 29,789 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 21,414 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 8,374 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per square kilometre, Eswatini or Tajikistan?
Eswatini, at 27,864 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre against 23,804 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre in Tajikistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per square kilometre between Eswatini and Tajikistan?
4,060 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Tajikistan?
27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Tajikistan rank globally for total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 127th and Tajikistan ranks 130th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Tajikistan: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/tajikistan/">Eswatini vs Tajikistan: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.