China vs Serbia: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre

China
367,433 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia
327,856 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
46th
Serbia rank
49th

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Serbia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k197720002023

How they compare

China currently reports 367,433 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre against 327,856 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 39,577 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

China ranks 46th and Serbia ranks 49th of 180 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 187,631 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 150,952 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 36,679 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre China
2010s 356,468 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 151,665 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 204,803 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre China
2020s 360,600 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 248,104 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 112,496 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per square kilometre, China or Serbia?
China, at 367,433 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre against 327,856 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per square kilometre between China and Serbia?
39,577 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do China and Serbia rank globally for total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per square kilometre?
China ranks 46th and Serbia ranks 49th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Serbia: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/serbia/">China vs Serbia: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.